Reading my local newspaper’s movie reviews (Raleigh News & Observer), I was a little perturbed to see that the Astro Boy review was mainly about how it was or was not appropriate for children.
Am I too distanced from childhood to determine this? Or too far away from adulthood/parenthood to think this was appropriate?
Okay, I haven’t seen Astro Boy yet, and I probably won’t, but that’s not the point here. I am wondering do we need disclaimers in reviews about children’s movies?
My personal experience as of late with “children’s movies” and little kids is, I saw Coraline in theaters, sitting maybe three seats away from a three year old girl who spent the greater part of the movie crying or whimpering. Almost all of the print reviews I came across had to mention how inappropriate it was as a film for little kids, which irked me. For film as an art form, the reviewers job is NOT to give age disclaimers. That’s not the reviewer’s job, that is the MPAA’s job. Coraline got a PG rating, and after that it is the parent’s job to read the fine print and determine whether or not their child is ready for the movie.
In the Astro Boy review, I just don’t see why their reasoning for parental caution was necessary. It talked about Dr. Tenma’s original son’s death and some of the violence. But let me think: An important death, featured in the early part of the movie? FINDING NEMO! There are so, sooo many deaths of characters that exist in children’s films, whether it’s on screen or just implied, BEAUTY AND THE BEAST. Sometimes that becomes a greater part of the plot, THE LION KING.
And this is my same point that I gave for Coraline. It’s the parents job to determine these things. You might think you are helping the parents by listing x or y reasons because they are the ones who will be reading the reviews, but that’s not the point of a review.
I’ve reached that point where I’m not sure if I’m too distanced from childhood to determine what did freak me out as a kid or whether I’m too far away from parenthood ethics to figure out whether or not I should care.
But maybe it’s the imposed mentality of parents that later influences kids? I know some people think The Nightmare Before Christmas is too spooky for little kids, but I saw it when I was 3 and loved it. But then I meet people my age who have never seen that movie or already base it as “Scary” when they were little, even though they’ve never seen it.
I’m entering a weird place. But this is bugging me! I don’t think parents or adults realize that kids are resilient. If something freaks them out, it will rarely haunt them into adulthood, and if it does, then that kid probably needed a shrink even without that movie’s effects. Yes, parents have the right to determine whether or not a movie is appropriate for their kids, but that is not a film reviewer’s job.
Okay. Rant over. (Aren’t you glad I didn’t launch into my alternate, but related rant of “Why do they always think animated movies are just for kids?!”)


